Company knowledge

How to Compare Keyword and Vector Search on Business Questions

Some searches find exact product codes but miss paraphrases; others return semantically related material for the wrong product. Categorize questions before comparing retrieval approaches.

In this article
  1. Separate identifiers from semantic questions
  2. Create questions with known relevant documents
  3. Separate retrieval tests from answer tests
  4. Understand failures before combining methods
  5. A worked business example
  6. Failure conditions to check
  7. A checklist for your workflow
Multiple monitors displaying programming code
Photo: Fotis Fotopoulos / Unsplash

Key takeaways

  • Vector search represents queries and content as numeric vectors, then uses distance or similarity to find nearby items.

  • Identify the relevant document for each question in advance.

  • One average score can hide exact-code failures.

Finding similar meanings does not guarantee an exact product-code match. Instead of asking which search method is smarter, compare what each one misses on the questions your team actually asks.

For the underlying concept, see What is vector search? in the AI glossary.

Separate identifiers from semantic questions

Keyword search can be useful for exact terms and identifiers, while vector search supports similarity-based retrieval. Azure’s hybrid search is one implementation combining them. Judge evidence retrieval on business questions rather than declaring a universal winner.

Create questions with known relevant documents

A fictional support team can include error codes, feature descriptions, symptoms, and comparisons between similar products. Have an owner identify the relevant document for each question. Include natural user phrasing and spelling variations, not just document titles.

Separate retrieval tests from answer tests

First check whether candidate results contain the needed clause. Then assess whether the answer uses it correctly. Do not collapse missing evidence and misinterpreted evidence into one undifferentiated score. Record latency and result length separately.

Understand failures before combining methods

If product codes work but natural-language symptoms fail, target that category first. Hybrid retrieval and reranking add configuration and operating considerations. Keep documents, permissions, and questions matched, and record wrong-product or obsolete-version results separately.

A worked business example

Consider a support team searches for “error E-17” and “screen freezes after payment.” The first needs an exact identifier; the second involves varied descriptions of a symptom.

Identify the relevant document for each question in advance. Test keyword, vector, and hybrid retrieval with matched documents and access, separating evidence retrieval from final-answer correctness.

Codes and symptoms → Matched retrieval → Compare failures
A review sequence for the example, not a product screenshot or measured result.

Failure conditions to check

One average score can hide exact-code failures. Compare wrong products, missing clauses, and latency by question type.

A checklist for your workflow

Item

Review question

Coverage

Do tests include codes, names, symptoms, and paraphrases?

Evidence retrieval

Is the needed clause among candidates?

Operations

Were latency, maintenance, and permissions compared?

Frequently asked questions

Is vector search sufficient for exact codes?

Test representative codes and confusion with similar identifiers.

Related AI concepts

Sources and editorial information

Microsoft: Hybrid search

TENCONIC editorial team · Structure reviewed October 28, 2026. Official sources explain concepts and implementation examples; features vary by product. Scenarios and checks are editorial recommendations, not customer results or product promises.

For the approach to connecting company knowledge with AI, explore the TENCONIC Data Engine introduction.